|
|
|
|
|
by nickjj
1542 days ago
|
|
Yeah that is an interesting point. It's really easy to drop in an initializer, make your patch, let it ride in production for a while and then contribute your patch back to the main project than it is to set up a fork and all of the ceremony involved with keeping it up to date. It's a good example of removing barriers of entry or an idea of Ruby's "sharp knives". Great for when you need it but can also be a disaster when abused. |
|
It's the one thing that keeps Ruby closer to true Aspect Oriented Programming than any other language (in my experience at least). It's probably the biggest thing that I miss from Ruby when working in other languages, even ones that I love like Elixir.