[prepend]

> The key to this whole thing is for a judge or jury to toss out the latter indemnification as unconscionable.

Yes, a judge could do that. But I am nowhere near a lawyer but this doesn’t seem unconscionable.

Scooters are purely optional and no one is forced to accept terms they don’t like.

If these terms were on public transit then I think that would be a better chance.

But some random company making you agree to hold the harmless seems pretty normal.

[droidno9]

The indemnification clause is quite broad. That's the part that could make it unconscionable.