Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by jozvolskyef 1534 days ago
Suppose I join the workforce at 26, and earn an average of 65k per year while in the <30 cohort, while my friend joins at 19 and earns an average of 55k per year, in this statistic I'll seem better off even though my friend earned 345k more.
1 comments

How are you not better off? You obviously had the means to sustain yourself for 7 years somehow without working.

They had to spend 14,000+ hours in order to earn those wages. Also depends on what their expenses are and if they are saving anything.

If we are to consider the definition of "better off" in strictly financial terms, the answer is clear. However, if we take into account a definition of "better off" that includes factors such as life satisfaction, I don't have the data to answer.