|
|
|
|
|
by zillolo
1539 days ago
|
|
Sorry, I exaggerated slightly. I think the hardware itself is mostly okay. It's just that my part of the work is providing a working OS on top of it, which is an absolute nightmare with Petalinux. I mean it's alright. It'll spit out an image that is going to work and you won't have to understand anything about Bitbake/Yocto and so on.
But that's exactly the problem: Petalinux cripples Yocto so bad with their "let's make this as easy as possibly"-philosophy, that it makes you go nuts if you want anything slightly custom.
We have plenty of different layers for distros, various platforms and applications. Fitting Petalinux into these is a pain. If you are going to build your OS for exactly one product that runs on a Xilinx device, go for it. If you wanna reuse something across multiple devices, I'd stay away. |
|
We don’t use Xilinx’s PetaLinux because it’s too limiting for the SW we want to run on top of it.