[robluxus]

This just seems like defending clickbait.

It's abundantly clear the author didn't mean what the title says only after after opening and skimming the article.

Granted, HN's title editorializing didn't help the case. But there's a difference between expecting to preserve the full information of the whole article in a singular title sentence and being annoyed that some title has just enough ambiguity in it that folks will likely click on it.