[the_af]

> "There is long history of science-fiction writers painting correct visions of, at the time seemingly impossible future"

That's a pretty weak argument. I love scifi, and I love for example Philip Dick's writing, yet I would not consider PKD's opinion on the future of AI/AGI particularly relevant.

James Cameron is not an authority on AI either.

If people said "Yudkowsky is a nice fanfiction author" it would be one thing. But he considers himself an actual AI researcher, and that's just not right. He is not qualified, and has no accomplishments in the area, other than writing fanfiction about it.

[psyc]

You keep hammering on with the same lazy slander. Yudkowsky was well known long before he wrote the popular Harry Potter fanfic, which incidentally is pedagogical / allegorical. Because his main roles are teacher and philosopher, and philosophers do that.

Here's a sampling of his non-fiction writing:

https://www.lesswrong.com/tag/sequences

https://intelligence.org/files/EthicsofAI.pdf

https://arxiv.org/abs/1710.05060

https://intelligence.org/files/AlignmentMachineLearning.pdf

https://arxiv.org/abs/1401.5577

https://arxiv.org/abs/1401.5577

https://intelligence.org/files/Corrigibility.pdf

https://intelligence.org/files/DefinabilityTruthDraft.pdf

https://intelligence.org/files/IEM.pdf

https://intelligence.org/files/TilingAgentsDraft.pdf

But you'll just say there's nothing of value there, and it's somehow figuratively "fan fiction", because he didn't go to college, and he doesn't work much on ML, which is clearly the end-all of AI.