|
|
|
|
|
|
by wolverine876
1544 days ago
|
|
|
> "Preserve presentation across platforms" is an anti-feature. No one has created a solution that satisfies that constraint because it's (a) a lot of work for (b) something that is the opposite of what the people involved are actually aiming for. I think you are missing the experiences of a large part of the user population. They put together their report, or book, or brochure or datasheet or whatever, and they want it to look a certain way, regardless of the platform, and they almost all use PDF. People care very much about how their work product looks. PDF is a solution that satisfies that constraint - I have seen it do that very consistently for a long time. How do you annotate blog posts, and in way that is preserved for decades. I almost suspect we are somehow talking different things, because even the most non-technical users know that about PDFs. But also it reads like you are finding a way to disagree with everything. |
|
|
I'm aware such people exist, I just don't confuse that fact with a belief that a majority of readers don't have problems with the experience of e.g. trying to read a PDF on a phone or anything else that isn't at least A4-/letter-sized (heck, PDFs have fewer people read them than would otherwise even when the person doing the reading is using a desktop or laptop)—precisely because PDFs preserve the presentation for print.
> How do you annotate blog posts, and in way that is preserved for decades.
Is that a statement or a question? In any case, it's hard to begin to conceptualize what sort of misunderstandings about the relevant media could lead to either. Blog posts (published originally as HTML, that is) are not inherently less susceptible to being saved than an academic article published as PDF. I did, however, already mention Zotero (and SingleFile).
> I almost suspect we are somehow talking different things, because even the most non-technical users know that about PDFs. But also it reads like you are finding a way to disagree with everything.
Am I? I'm pretty sure that I understand what you're saying, at least, and that we're talking about the same things. I don't know what you expect, though, when the fundamental premises are in dispute. There's no way to just "yes-and" through disagreements like that.