|
|
|
|
|
by codingdave
1540 days ago
|
|
Agreed. I'm not saying they are in the clear, I'm saying that neither do we have enough information to declare that they definitely broke laws - the law being cited contained both flexibility and ambiguity and it would take some legal research and knowledge to know more. (And now that I think of it, we aren't even citing the law, we are talking about a summary of the law that is posted online.) |
|