|
|
|
|
|
by throwawaylala1
1542 days ago
|
|
That first example is deceptive. In this line: for i := 0; i <= n; i++ {
The "<=" character just looks like a "<" character due to the typeface that the author chose. I'm going to assume that wasn't an accident because it perfectly masks the obvious bug in the for loop.When I did a quick scan of that code it looked good to me. Then he claimed it should panic and I felt crazy. So I copy/pasted the code into an editor to see wtf was going on and sure enough it was "<=". |
|
It's like someone decided that the I, l, 1 confusion wasn't enough and decided to add more. :P