Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by SpodGaju 1544 days ago
1950 Tax Rate - 91.0% > $400,000

The economy overall grew by 37% during the 1950s. At the end of the decade, the median American family had 30% more purchasing power than at the beginning. Inflation was minimal, in part because of Eisenhower's efforts to balance the federal budget.

Unemployment remained low, about 4.5%.

2 comments

The United States held the majority of the worlds factories and almost all of the ones that weren’t in a decimated war torn country.

It took nearly 20 years to rebuild Europe to the point that it could compete, and USSR was largely cut off from global supply in western worlds.

It’s not the same today and one cannot possibly assert with a straight face that we would enjoy a decade of 37% growth with those rates.

No one paid that tax rate.

https://taxfoundation.org/taxes-on-the-rich-1950s-not-high/

Average rate paid by the 1% back then was around 41%

Apples, meet oranges.

"The data comes from a recent paper by Thomas Piketty, Emmanuel Saez, and Gabriel Zucman that attempts to account for all federal, state, and local taxes paid by different groups of Americans over the last 100 years"

But regardless, it was higher in 1950, almost 6 points higher.

And look at al the caveats...

1] Some of the distributional assumptions in the Piketty, Saez, and Zucman paper are questionable. In particular, the authors assume that the full burden of the corporate income tax falls on owners of capital, which may not be correct. However, the authors note that they “have tested a number of alternative tax incidence assumptions, and found only second-order effects.”

[3] It is worth noting that, per the Piketty, Saez, and Zucman data, the tax rates of the top 0.1 and 0.01 percent of taxpayers have dropped substantially since the 1950s. The average tax rate on the 0.1 percent highest-income Americans was 50.6 percent in the 1950s, compared to 39.8 percent today. The average tax rate on the top 0.01 percent was 55.3 percent in the 1950s, compared to 40.8 percent today.

[4] The data from Piketty, Saez, and Zucman is not divided among federal, state, and local taxes, so it is difficult to tell exactly how much the rich were paying in federal income taxes specifically during this period.

>But regardless, it was higher in 1950, almost 6 points higher.

Sure, but you're being quite disingenuous with your post by suggesting that tax rates were any different back then compared to now.

They were different. 6% different. That is a big raise for any income.