[davedx]

I think it's a good idea if it's presented as "here are the facts supporting each side of the argument". What I don't think is a good idea is providing alternative editorial views on something, e.g. I totally agree giving support to Owens or Posobiec as some kind of legitimate "alternative viewpoint" is not productive to healthy discourse. (These commentators constantly argue in bad faith and twist facts to absurd degrees to suit their narrative).

Present the facts and let people decide which viewpoint makes the most sense. That would be a really valuable service.