Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by exabrial 1546 days ago
I admit we do miss that part. Instead for us it's `sudo apt -y install app-name`
2 comments

installing the app locally isn't as sustainable. The data and configuration for test environments gets scattered across the system and is less reproducible for new comers. As changes are made to the test environment, developers have to then install/update/reconfigure manually. It becomes an nmo effort with less consistency and more error over the single line docker-compose up
Don't disagree, but we just avoid writing stuff where you need to have 10+ apps running locally to run "an app". That itself isn't sustainable architecture, those should be one app in a monolith.

That being said, to your point, we do have some inter-service dependencies that have to run separately. We haven't figured out a good balance yet, but it's the exception not the rule fortunately, and everyone "just knows" how to run an extra app in those extreme cases.

do you have a 'sudo apt uninstall app-name' to clean everything up?
Yes! In fact, an upgrade path too in the script.
Sounds great as long as you either put work into multi OS compatibility or stick to the same OS.

Depending on your situation that sounds like you have a good solution that's working and you're happy with.