|
|
|
|
|
by rootusrootus
1539 days ago
|
|
> Termination must have a cause, be backed up with documentation, and ideally display the company's attempts at remediation (i.e. the PIP). In my experience that's exactly how it works already. It's expensive to fire an employee. If I wanted to let someone go, HR would make me prove it was necessary and require the VP to sign off on it. And if the employee in question is known to be a member of a protected class (the biggest one being anyone middle aged or above) and they even speculate about the possibilities of legal action, good luck firing them at all, justified or not. |
|