|
|
|
|
|
by denton-scratch
1537 days ago
|
|
There's a tendency to explain away behaviour as being the result of a person being "bad". It's a lazy way out. > healthy teeth So "cannot be reasoned with" seems to mean "refuses to accept that I'm right". If you have charge of an unruly kid, I hope you aren't focusing mainly on their dental hygiene. > These kids are labeled troubled because they are. Gosh, that sounds rather black-and-white - they're "bad" because they're "bad". I think the word "troubled" here is serving as a dog-whistle; a lot/all of the time, what's being referred to as "troubled" is really "traumatised". |
|
That's unnecessarily combative. Are you arguing that refusing to brush your teeth is a reasonable position?
> I hope you aren't focusing mainly on their dental hygiene.
Dental hygiene was OP's example.
> a lot/all of the time, what's being referred to as "troubled" is really "traumatised".
I agree that most of the "troubled" kids I've known have been traumatized. But traumatization does not necessarily lead to being "troubled", and being "troubled" does not require traumatization. In any case, it does not excuse illegal, damaging, and destructive behaviors.