Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by JuettnerDistrib 1539 days ago
It's pretty obvious if you ignore the great leap backwards... I mean forward, coming down from ~40 births/1000 in the 1950s and 1960s to ~20 in the late 70s and after.
1 comments

You mean to ignore the dip during the leap, ignore the spike in the 1960 (assuming this is the recovery from the leap), so that we would have ~flat line up to year 1970?
Yes, exactly!
That does make sense. I stand corrected, thanks!