Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by Arubis 1542 days ago
> Why are monitors so expensive and old tech compared to TVs?

(“Smart”) TVs are subsidized by the push advertising and analytics crammed into their firmware.

1 comments

(Reputable) source?
Bill Baxter (CTO, Vizio)

Smart TVs continue to make money for the manufacture after the sale by providing data to viewer measurement and consumer research companies and through all of those apps they integrate in the TV’s smart functions and subsequent app usage.

“This is a cutthroat industry,” Baxter went on to say. “It’s pretty ruthless. The greater strategy is I really don’t need to make money off the TV. I need to cover my costs.”

http://cjni.com/smart-tvs-too-smart/

How about Vizio's Q4 earnings report? You can see that "Platform+" accounts for nearly twice as much profit as hardware in 2021.

https://investors.vizio.com/investor-relations/default.aspx

Because money is "funny" inside companies, and because there's no platform sales without hardware sales, I would think that the relevant metric from an external perspective is total revenue (The change in fraction of revenue over the years is probably interesting too).
I use a LG CX 48 as a monitor.

Every time I switch it on I get an ad for Apple Music that I can't disable.

Lol where have you been? There must be a dozen or so articles on HN in the last year alone.