Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by glmdev 1552 days ago
Not saying you're wrong, but do you have a source for the 60/1000x number? Curious to read more.
1 comments

Yeah, where did I read it, I think John McCarthy checked it out along with...who could it have been...definitely him.
Today one Lisp Machine CPU emulator written in assembler is 80 times faster than the original Lisp hardware. This could be made faster by a JIT compiler. Native code Lisp compilers for x86-64 or Apple's M1 are roughly 800 times faster than the original Lisp hardware (the third generation Ivory processor).
Wow! Really?! So the M1 really is faster in a non-gimmicky way? I could cut out this X86-64 assembly bullshit, at 800x I could be happy just with Lisp. Assembly all based on C by this point anyway...