Curious why they go through each letter saying yes or no, instead of just teaching them how to pick letters based on a binary output (ie: a= 00000, b=00001)? you'd think the characters per minute would increase dramatically.
It occurs to me that this is a binary search on the alphabet, but could be made into a much more human-compatible format: “Is the letter in the first half of the alphabet?” “Is the letter between A and F?”
I'm not sure that's exactly human friendly. Can people answer questions like that without training? Would the amount of thought needed create a noise signal?
If they have vision, you could ask "Which of these two sets is the letter in", where the sets were dynamically generated by predictive software.
yeah, I guess you'd start with the first 13/last 13 and break it down in halves from there. It would take only 6 choices to pick a letter. I still think memorizing the binary version of the letters would be faster, and wouldn't take all that long considering the amount of use.
https://amp.theguardian.com/science/2010/feb/03/vegetative-s...