Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by toomuchtodo 1551 days ago
It is a shame that the new DHS 72 hour reporting requirement was not in effect when this breach occurred, but it is extremely evident why it is required. Regarding business classification, I don't think it's too difficult to argue that commercial identity providers are critical infra.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30699024

https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/2471...

2 comments

That law is modelled on laws in the EU, Australia and other countries. I know if my employer is one of the affected companies they are in breach of our notification laws.
GDPR already covers this. If companies with EU employees were among the 2.5% ( not unlikely), they should have disclosed this, first to the ICO and customers, then the public.