|
|
|
|
|
by hprotagonist
1550 days ago
|
|
The study comes in the context of past findings of serious misconduct against Birbaumer and Chaudhary. The findings concerned the data and analysis in two previous papers published in PLoS Biology. The two articles, subsequently retracted, also concerned the use of brain activity to decode the thoughts of completely locked-in patients. The German research agency, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) found that the scientists failed to show complete analysis of their data and patient examinations in these previous studies and made false statements. The allegations do not relate to the findings of the current research which involved different methodology, supervision and analysis. In a statement to Technology Networks, Birbaumer said that the new study “shows that all accusations are wrong” and suggested that additional forthcoming legal developments would further exonerate his and Chaudhary’s prior research. man that's a scary last paragraph. Locked-in research is very, very sensitive to this sort of thing, for obvious reasons. |
|
At first he thought the nurse was just being unsocial when they came to do routine stuff with him! and then he realized he was in spectator mode
Its going to be really hard for a lot of people when they find out whats going on with their locked in or previously locked in loved ones