|
|
|
|
|
|
by drewcoo
1547 days ago
|
|
|
I was willing to accept the title until I read this. And now I agree with the GP. You're clearly creating a strawman, stretching the meaning of automation into something nobody thinks it is so that you can proclaim it a myth. The title should be "Total Automation . . ." or "Complete Automation . . ." so as not to mislead like this. |
|
|
Automation is also framed as a universal phenomenon that will sweep across the globe, remaking 'the economy' and society. But there are economies plural and technology is cultural and contextual. So I push against this concept and point to automated technologies and how they differ from place to place, in the book zooming into Xinjiang in China, for example, to examine how technologies intersect with historical prejudice.
Automation is also linked 'the human', but historically some people are more 'human' than others and the history of labor is one of inequality. So some (PoC, women, immigrants, etc) bear the brunt of automated technologies while others less.
In other words, automation is not just a myth because its not full automation, but because its a story that obscures the messier and more devastating details that happen on the ground.