|
|
|
|
|
by BeetleB
1553 days ago
|
|
It's a nice perspective, but the fact that more people have read Fifty Shades/Twilight than the sum total of all who have read any of Charles Stross's works undercuts your point. And while you add to point 3, it wasn't my main point. Take any two exceptionally good writers who have very different styles. If one of them produces literate code, the other may be able to understand it very well, but it is unlikely that he can modify it, along with the prose, and maintain the quality of the literate document. It's not just about bad writers, but incompatibly good ones. |
|
> can modify it, along with the prose, and maintain the quality of the literate document.
for a living. As long as you're accomplished enough of a writer, you'll be able to analyze the works of others and copy them easily. It's coming up with your own style that's a problem.
To summarize: exceptionally good writers will be able to modify and expand each other's work without much effort. Or at least that's what I believe, based on some personal experiences with writing and writers. It should be quite similar with literate programming, too.