|
|
|
|
|
by user-the-name
1542 days ago
|
|
No, there are not. Pretty much all the popular contenders are less plausible, and most still need dark matter to explain all observations, so they only add more complexity. Dark matter is a simple theory that explain a wide variety of unrelated observations. |
|
In any case, until we actually are able to test that this is one "thing" rather than a bunch of things we still have no idea about, we should stop calling it "dark <foo>". Because I think that a lot of people are under the impression that there is some discrete substance out there causing this discrepancy, and there really is no reason to believe that's the case.