|
|
|
|
|
by pgcj_poster
1549 days ago
|
|
I get the impression that memorization fell out of favor in education
because in the past, it was used as an ends in itself
rather than a tool to generate insight. In school, my dad had to memorize a lot of dates
with precision down to the day.
That seems mostly-useless to me.
Just knowing the decade is sufficient
for most analysis.
To take the article's example,
the putative link between
"Row v. Wade (1973) → Downswing in crime since the 1990s"
only really requires that you know
that the ruling occurred sometime in the 70s. I think the strategy, then, should be to memorize things
that are likely to generate insights
and to the level of precision that will likely be necessary to do so.
You should probably commit to memory that Andrew Johnson
was the president after Lincoln in 1860s
-- but you probably don't need to remember
that Millard Fillmore succeeded Zachary Taylor on July 9, 1850. |
|