[sidlls]

I do not, though I have done so in the past to a small extent. Long before I came of age the notion of "free" software (in any context) had been well down the path of corruption by corporate interests. My opinion is that these days just about anyone who works on open source code (especially popular, widely used code) without remuneration is effectively a tool to accelerate the race to the bottom in the labor vs capital holder struggle. Why would I want to contribute to that?

[jka]

I can't critique the risk you raise about reward for worker time; that's valid concern.

But isn't part of the thesis of capitalism that it should drive market efficiencies and thus reduce the cost of goods and services for consumers?

(that could have sounded tongue-in-cheek; it's not intended to be. as I genuinely understand it, cost reductions over time are supposed to be one of the benefits of the free market system. and if those savings are being achieved thanks to open source software in industry -- which I believe they are -- then I think it's worthwhile questioning the effects. do profit margins and tax burdens increase accordingly with the efficiency savings, for example?)

[sidlls]

I don’t think the premise of market efficiency gains in capitalism rests on having a pool of free exploitable labor, though. Even in very strictly capitalist systems labor is supposed to be compensated (with money or equivalent value, not stars on a GitHub repo): just less than the value their labor provides the owner of capital.

[jka]

Agreed. For what it's worth: when contributing to FOSS projects without financial compensation, I generally don't feel exploited.

Perhaps I would feel exploited if I learned that the systems I was contributing to were being used for purposes that I disagree with -- but to counteract that, I think that I can choose to select to contribute to systems that are more likely to be used, on aggregate, for good, thanks to the (perceived?) nature of the projects themselves (and the fact that there are usually at least a few projects that fulfil the dependency gap for any given problem).

Most of the value I derive is selfish in terms of solving my own problems, building my profile (ego, essentially), and a kind of satisfaction (smug even, sometimes, perhaps) at helping solve future problems for a larger audience than myself.

But at the same time I'm very aware that this is a privileged position to be in, to have learned software skills and to be able to pay the bills using those. I think a lot of experienced developers want to provide something back to the next generation: the question is whether the same compensation models are going to apply, or whether the industry is going through a strange topological change that could make for different social contracts for developers.