Why are you attacking the author’s character rather than refuting the author’s words? Seems like a dishonest way to undermine another person’s opinion.
Because I do not work in the legal field so I can't verify whether what she's claiming is true or widespread. But I can evaluate her other actions actions and statements and from there extrapolate that this is likely a fabrication or an occurrence far outside the norm that reaffirms her biases so she's amplifying it.