[grobclaw]

> Many philosophers and public members are sad that you insist on ignoring their input

On the contrary, I strongly encourage them to give input, and I criticise those who would rather give up, dismiss the questions as impossible to solve, and lament how technology has been destroying society for the last 2000 years, while self-driving cars still start being used leading to suffering that could have been prevented by thinking about things more and seeing them from more points of view.

Which inputs by philosophers or the public are being ignored?