ENS [0] seems to be a use case here [1][2] and even the concept can be used by merchants for users to donate / pay towards verified names e.g: (myshopname.eth) rather than 0x123..cdef. That still isn't an example?
I mean, I can even see that in reputable payment services like Stripe, BitPay and Coinbase Commerce in the future.
Thanks for sharing, we totally agree with the utility in collaboration and sharing.
ENS/wallets give users a lot of utility on Skiff - it makes logging in to privacy-first platforms easier (manage on secret key/seed phrase), sharing easier (ENS vs. an address), and decentralized storage can be nice if you don't want your data hosted on big tech.
First sentence of the Bitcoin whitepaper: "A purely peer-to-peer version of electronic cash would allow online
payments to be sent directly from one party to another without going through a
financial institution."
Except that's a lie because you need a middleman to process the transaction (mining group). And in reality it ends up having another company like coinbase in the middle as well. So now you're in a worse position than before.
Maybe, maybe not. Certainly some people who are doing this will continue to do so despite regulation. In any case disproves the comment I was replying to.
I mean, I can even see that in reputable payment services like Stripe, BitPay and Coinbase Commerce in the future.
[0] https://ens.domains
[1] https://www.skiff.org/updates/skiff-ens
[2] https://www.skiff.org