|
|
|
|
|
by moistofreason
1555 days ago
|
|
Quit it with the straw man BS. You can overdose on any substance. Taking a medication is always going to be safer under supervision. My issue is that the use of IVM got politicized and as a result the will of many doctors and patients was undermined. A large number of the people who took it illicitly did it so because pharmacies stopped filling valid prescriptions. If you want to talk about safety: The same crowd bitching about IVM happened to be the people pushing a vaccine with much less data supporting its safety and questionable efficacy on people under 50. Their logic:
- Mandate a new drug, using a new technology on the entire world, even though there were no real Phase III trials. - Don’t look into prophylactic treatment options which are cheaper and known to be safe. - Call anyone who studies anything else a conspiracy theorist and a quack - Actively suppress peer reviewed articles that don’t follow the narrative. (Including refusing to publish or unpublishing work in major journals) |
|
To be clear, IVM was just another politicization. It was a rush decision to reject the obvious mainstream option and an attempt to find alternative treatments so that people could take a medicine with known side effects and unknown efficacy over one with known efficacy and unknown side effects, all seemingly because it felt better to be counterculture and was an act of defiance against "big {your adjective of hate here}".
After billions or doses and ever more research it's pretty obvious which side made the right call.