[dougb]

I started at Akamai in July 2002 and I received an option grant as part of my offer. Since I had options before, I thought they were all priced at the closing price on the day they were approved by the board. But Akamai had a provision in their option agreement that priced the options at 4 different prices. The price of the first quarter of my stock was the closing price the day the grant was approved by the board. The 2nd quarter was priced 90 days later, the 3rd 90 days after that, and the final price as 270 days after the initial grant. No one mentioned this odd pricing during the interview process, and I never thought to ask about it in the interview process, I just assumed they priced them all at once like my previous options.

I was told after I complained to HR, that they did this for MY benefit! Because their stock went straight to $300/share at the IPO and then started a slow decline. This was a good policy for people that started after the stock hit $300 and before I started because each quarter of their stock was priced lower than the previous quarter. But for those of us that started close to the bottom $2/share, it sucked!

One guy who started after me quit when he found out about the 4 different prices.