|
|
|
|
|
|
by sho_hn
1552 days ago
|
|
|
I didn't read the article. I only watched the video. The video to me made a convincing case that the object seen in the video file is a glare at the location of a heat-emitting object. I'd now be ready for a follow-up discussing whether the motion of the object (accounting for the gimbal system) is unusual or not. The video didn't get into it one way or another, but it's the obvious next question to ask. |
|
|