[bttf]

Sure; because it is a monolith, it makes things simpler by having just the one backend container to scale. So it's a matter of making more instances of it available (via # of pod replicas in your k8s cluster) for increasing availability.

You can start using k8s right away, and just have 3 replicas running to start. As you scale, just up the number of replicas (and nodes as you need them) as you go.

Your real bottleneck becomes the database at that point (in addition to any blocking 3rd party APIs you may be using), which I would not host in k8s but use a managed service such as AWS RDS. This bottleneck will make itself apparent later on, depending on your application and the scale you reach. But you should definitely have the resources to cross that bridge once you, if ever, reach it, because you should be dealing with a large number of customers at that point.

[star_juice]

Ah gotcha yeah at the small scale(?) scaling we're talking about monolithic applications, being a bit simpler to organize and run, do still make for a compelling solution. That's a great tip regarding how to handle ballooning storage issues via managed cloud offerings (in the weird case I make something that really works) that I hadn't considered. However, it's starting to feel like these scaling questions/solutions are a lot more akin to Factorio bottleneck chasing than I would like haha.