Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by nivenkos 1552 days ago
It's pretty good and practical.

The only real downsides are in the library availability and deployment vs. more established languages.

I'd choose to use it if I could though, it has the least downsides of any language IMO.

2 comments

Library availability is pretty much anything with a C FFI, that should cover a lot of ground. Deployment is also very simple, there are ways of making your app into a "portable", self-contained binary that will work essentially anywhere. Rust is also one of few languages that can seamlessly (e.g. with no need for an added runtime) target WASM.
Wasn't Amazon buying ownership of it recently? Seems a substantial disadvantage if that comes to pass
Amazon is a member of the Rust Foundation, they haven’t “bought” the language.

Edit to add: https://foundation.rust-lang.org/members/

Hiring core devs and imposing control that way if I'm following the discussions successfully, e.g https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28513130.

Interested in reasons to believe Amazon are not going to determine the future of the language, I'm at least six months out of date.