Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by nomel 1557 days ago
Why? Doesn't think prove that their customers are actually protected, unlike the many other popular VPNs?
1 comments
testesttest 1557 days ago
It proves they are based out of the US and lost a court case. If I owned the company I would do the same if nothing else but to preserve capital.
link
nomel 1555 days ago
The fact that they lost a court case, rather than the users, says something about their implementation. There were several VPNs where this was not the case.
link