[robocat]

I presume that is because it is a complicated feature, but not technically impossible? Although perhaps using contentEditable* makes an implementation more difficult?

* From article: “CodeMirror would achieve that by leaning on native browser text editing (via contentEditable) rather than implementing text editing entirely in the library/javascript.”.

Edit: from https://blog.replit.com/codemirror “CodeMirror 6 is a complete rewrite of the CodeMirror editor with a focus on accessibility, touchscreen support, and extensibility.”. I expect that marjin really cares about accessibility. However, in my limited experience, as a lone developer I couldn’t make our complex product properly accessible unless that was the focus of say six months effort, which we couldn’t afford at the time.

[mltony]

Ah, you're right, CodeMirror 6 appears to be more accessible. However it still only shows one line at a time. So that's still worse than Monaco. Monaco can show one or two hundred lines at a time. So with CodeMirror 6 I still would have to read text line by line without any way to skip a function for example, which is unnecesarily tedious.

Sure, I understand that people don't have infinite time to spend on perfect accessibility. I was careful not to have any blaming tone in my message.