[jacquesm]

You can argue all you want but understanding Putin's motivations to start this war isn't going to help stopping it.

The bigger question is how far Putin is willing to escalate it so he can pretend to claim victory, the West has zero agency in getting Putin to stop unless they are prepared to escalate themselves, but apparently we are willing to stand by watch thousands of people get murdered, using illegal weapons no less. Appeasing Putin is what got us into this war in the first place, it made the West look weak when in fact all they wanted was to avoid yet another war. But we're there now, and that changes everything, looking back at how you got here may help inform the worlds response to the next dictator that tries for a landgrab.

Mearsheimer may well have had a point, but it's easy to argue from the sidelines, the options before us at the time, to either allow Ukraine into NATO or to let them fend for themselves both had significant downsides. Dictators do what dictators do: throw people into the meatgrinder to make up for their own deficiencies, it doesn't need any high degree of intelligence to observe that, least of all about Russia.

[yodsanklai]

> Appeasing Putin is what got us into this war in the first place

In what sense did the West try to appease Putin? Which of Putin's long standing revendications concerning Ukraine have been taken into account by the West?

> looking back at how you got here may help inform the worlds response to the next dictator that tries for a landgrab.

Well, looking back, many voices told us what the world's response should have been, such as [1]

[1] https://www.ft.com/content/b5886606-4d7d-41af-87c1-8d9993722...

But in your opinion, what should the response have been?

[jacquesm]

'Just asking questions'... such a great strategy.

Sorry, not playing.

[yodsanklai]

There's no strategy. You're the one claiming "Appeasing Putin is what got us into this war in the first place". Excuse me to ask for clarification, as this is pretty much the opposite of what Mearsheimer (and other experts) are saying.

And I'm not only asking questions, I've also told you how I think this war could have been avoided (see the linked FT article). I also consider it may be stopped the exact same way it could have been avoided, by considering Putin's not crazy and accepting some of his revendications (but I'm just parroting Chomsky or Mearsheimer, for lack of better explanations).

[celticninja]

How has the west appeased Putin? How about when he annexed Crimea? Poisoned litvineko, skripal or navalny? Shall I continue?