|
|
|
|
|
by dataflow
1565 days ago
|
|
My guess is the scenario they're worried about is neither debts nor criminal harm, but civil liability. Like say the counterparty claims you had an implicit warranty regarding X, but in fact you didn't, and that they suffered damages as a result. Then can they go after your personal funds to recover damages (if they win)? |
|
[0]: https://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/limited-liability-pr...