|
|
|
|
|
by SamBam
1556 days ago
|
|
> I've never understood why we need 4 or 5 burner ranges, possibly with a slight size variations. I really only ever want one high power burner and one simmer burner. I don't mean this to sound rude, though I know it will, but this is the literal definition of "argument from ignorance." You don't use more than two burners, so you don't know why a stove needs more than two. I personally frequently cook with three or all four burners. Further, there are meals where I might use the two small back burners, and meals where I might use the two large front ones. I guess you could be describing a need for stoves that came with just two burners, for those who couldn't imagine using more. But, seriously, would you have bought a two-burner model if it had been available, knowing that you might have wished for more even one night a year? |
|