Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by tuccinator 1556 days ago
The island is only 1.5 acres though. The size is too small to build any significant infrastructure. The island could maybe fit 100 people on it comfortably. I cannot find any reason that someone would want to visit this place for longer than a few hours.
2 comments

100 people is about 5m² per person. That's already a crowd. The island is smaller than Times Square. It's 100 times smaller than Vatican City, it's in fact a fifth the size of St Peter's square.
49 m² per person, enough for a small house, not 5. If you build a skyscraper (or, more ambitiously, underground) you could have luxury space for hundreds of people. Energy would be a problem, but not as much of a problem as the Belizean government.

    $ units
    Currency exchange rates from FloatRates (USD base) on 2019-05-31 
    3460 units, 109 prefixes, 109 nonlinear units

    You have: 1.2 acres
    You want: 
            Definition: 4856.2277 m^2
    You have: 1.2 acres/100 people
    You want: 
            Definition: 48.562277 m^2
Coming soon: Caribbean Walled City
Less useful in the era of high explosive artillery shells, much less high-altitude bombers, cruise missiles, ballistic missiles, and precision-guided munitions.
I think this has nothing to do with defence and everything to do with Kowloon Walled City that was sort of a no law enclave where everything was built very high and shoulder to shoulder to maximize floor space.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kowloon_Walled_City

Oh, I was just thinking of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Walled_city, which describes nearly all cities for the past ten thousand years, though less so for the last 5% of that time.
Isn't it 60m2 per person?
How about to set up a bank account and mailing address?
I'm a big fan of charter cities/SEZs and new city/country projects but I'm more skeptical this is a practical avenue for making money. There are plenty of established jurisdictions to do this (e.g. basically all the former British colonies, a few American states) and the 'infrastructure' of lawyers, accountants, etc. who know how to deal with it are already established. This is the same reason I don't get why people are bullish on e-Residency for Honduras, Liberland, etc. What's the real value prop of incorporating an entity in these places?
With CRS/FATCA infecting almost every country, then that might be the reason?