I suppose that parent comment is trying to say that given our history with nuclear waste, especially with the increasing caution, it hasn't caused any (significant) incident by the waste
Yes? But given that our history with nuclear waste is a blip and we have to make sure it continue to works throughout wars, dictatorships and so on for the next 10 000 years, then how is the current track record relevant?
It's akin to saying it's safe to eat led because I did it 5 minutes ago and so far I'm feeling perfectly fine. It's an argument which either is some form or propaganda or just stupid.
It's akin to saying it's safe to eat led because I did it 5 minutes ago and so far I'm feeling perfectly fine. It's an argument which either is some form or propaganda or just stupid.