[nfriedly]

I know this isn't quite what your asking for, but one idea is to set up a Pi-hole + unbound: https://docs.pi-hole.net/guides/dns/unbound/

Unbound is basically your own private DNS resolver and then Pi-hole lets you filter out whatever "junk" you don't want.

[drexlspivey]

Unbound will also pre-fetch your most common lookups prior to the TTL expiring so it's probably even faster than querying a third-party resolver

[stingraycharles]

Or you can just run unbound directly. I’ve been doing that for years, and let it directly resolve with the root DNS servers. Can’t get more neutral than that, I’d argue.

[mekster]

I'm using Adguard Home and it's working great.

https://github.com/AdguardTeam/AdGuardHome

[egamirorrim]

I don't know if it's an obvious question or not, but how does performance compare with your own unbound vs quad1/8/9? I imagine it's slower in general?

[nfriedly]

I'm not personally running unbound, just a Pi-hole that up-stream's to my ISP's DNS, so I can't answer you from first-hand experience. But, according to drexlspivey, unbound will pre-fetch common queries, so it probably ends up being faster on average - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30646020

[lapinot]

I never measured anything, but i'm running a recursive resolver on my laptop since a couple years (knot resolver) and never had any performance problem.

[justsomehnguy]

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30649709

[khimaros]

for anyone running OpenWRT, unbound + adblock works well and is trivially configurable via the LUCI web interface.