|
|
|
|
|
by georgyo
1557 days ago
|
|
I am going to remove morality from the discussion temporarily, and instead talk about how practical that is. A post breaks a law in 100 countries, but does not break the law in 20 countries. Should all 100 countries file their own removal process? Should there be an army of reviewers who are knowledgeable about all laws reviewing all posts? What about that confusion that different people from different regions are seeing different timelines for the same user. The US has Federal Laws, State Laws, and City Laws. All of these are laws of the land. No company can keep up with all local laws. "Breaking the law" is highly subjective by itself. Take the US for example, we have "Freedom of Speech," but that does not protect all speech. Many of these cases go to court taking years to determine if something was or was not protected. Should meta defer all moderation to the legal court system? What you are suggesting makes sense in a vacuum, but cannot exist in reality. |
|