|
|
|
|
|
by pydry
1561 days ago
|
|
>Yeah, invasions suck, but the war in Libya wasn't to seize Libya and integrate it into NATO. It was arguably enforcing, not violating, the rule-based order. At least NATO has a better argument for this invasion than Putin does for the invasion of Ukraine. However you frame it, Libya was still destroyed by the NATO intervention on the side of the rebels and it is now a failed state. As Hillary said, "We came, we saw, he died". It's pretty clear why Putin was incandescent with rage over it. Putin now thinks (with some justification) that this is a template for Russia. As he eyes up tiny independence movements he has to wonder if they'll suddenly grow into NATO backed rebels with major firepower. In all likelihood the Ukrainian invasion wouldnt have happened without Libya. |
|
World powers backing separatist groups with funding has a much, much older history that Libya in 2011. Heck, Russia is currently funding several.