[version_five]

Maybe a naive question: is there no transfer learning with transformers? I've done a lot of work with CNN architectures on small datasets, and almost always start with something trained on imagenet, and fine tune, or do some kine of semi-supervised training to start. Can we do that with VIT et al as well? Or are they really usually trained from scratch?

[stevenwalton]

Lots of people transfer learn with transformers. ViT[0] originally did CIFAR with it. Then DeiT[1] introduced some knowledge transfer (note: their student is larger than the teacher). ViT pretrained on both ImageNet21k and JFT-300m.

CCT ([1] from above) was focused on training from scratch.

There's two paradigms to be aware of. ImageNet and pre-training can often be beneficial but it doesn't always help. It really depends on the problem you're trying to tackle and if there are similar features within the target dataset and the pre-trained dataset. If there is low similarity you might as well train from scratch. Also, you might not want as large of models (like ViT and DeiT have, which ViT's has more parameters than CIFAR-10 has features).

Disclosure: Author on CCT

[0] https://arxiv.org/abs/2010.11929

[1] https://arxiv.org/abs/2012.12877

[version_five]

Awesome, thanks for the reply. It's been on my list to try transformers instead of (mainly) Resnet for a while now.

[stevenwalton]

Sure thing. Also if you're getting into transformers I'd recommend lucidrains's GitHub[0] since it has a large collection of them with links to papers. It's nice that things are consolidated.

[0] https://github.com/lucidrains/vit-pytorch