[fmvab]

My point is, it doesn't matter whether you or I consider it a "bad definition". To say that these things are not pyramid schemes "in any way" is unnecessarily pedantic and not useful considering the context (the implications of their terms of service).

[Dylan16807]

As far as the terms of service go, I could see conflating a pyramid and a ponzi, but a pump and dump is pretty distantly related.

And saying they need to remove that part of the ToS to honestly accept any crypto business is silly.

You could make an argument against allowing entirely new coins, I guess, but that's more about the other ToS terms than 'pyramid scheme'.