|
|
|
|
|
by lbriner
1560 days ago
|
|
What's the alternative? As a Hiring Manager, do I need to spend multiple hours with 20 candidates to get a really valuable insight into who they are really like or should I just screen them with a basic exam so I only need to interview the 4 who can do it? What insults me is when someone wants to be paid more than a doctor based on no qualifications and the fact that they tell me they are worth it. If you cannot do the exam but can discuss it with the company who accept your argument then great, if you can't then you probably don't want to work for them anyway so just chalk it up to experience and move on. |
|
What's stopping you from selectively removing exams from people who actually do have the qualifications?
> If you cannot do the exam but can discuss it with the company who accept your argument then great
I could flip it around and say, if you cannot hire strong engineers without exams, discuss with your company to make someone else the hiring manager.
If I was your employee and I saw positions remain open for years (burdening existing employees), I would question your ability to set good processes.