|
|
|
|
|
by pdonis
1562 days ago
|
|
> Another NASA screw-up that they're trying to pin on the vendor engineers, just like Challenger. And, for context, Edward Tufte, whose review of the slides is being referenced in this article, is the same one who misunderstood and misrepresented what the actual issue was during the briefing the night before the Challenger launch, in his paper reviewing the presentation the engineers made then. Edit: previous HN discussions of Tufte's Challenger review here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10989358 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19034783 |
|
But their recommendation was challenged by the NASA SRB managers. And after an offline discussion the SRB vendor came back and had changed their opinion that it was safe. And the NASA SRB manager never brought up the o-ring temperature concern to the rest of the management team.
[0] https://history.nasa.gov/rogersrep/v1p90.jpg
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space_Shuttle_Challenger_disas...