[hutrdvnj]

> If arguments are obviously wrong, they are easily refuted.

Let's assume we live in an idealized world, where everyone could indeed easily refute false information. In this case you're right.

This is unfortunately not the case for many. The US citizens are a good example, Trump can claim voter fraud and continue to do so even if there's zero evidence. This is not an opinion, but false information. However, many people still believe Trumps words, and if they crowd up, storm the capitol and kill police officers, based on false information, then this has nothing todo with freedom of speech.