|
|
|
|
|
by munificent
1569 days ago
|
|
> while land borders are clearly defined I think we take for granted that they are clearly defined now because nation-states worked very hard to define, create, and enforce that concept. As I understand it, for most of human history there was no real notion of a well-bounded state and even today sovereignty is hotly debated in some areas. So, it's not that enforcing land borders is intrinsically easy. It's that it appears easy because nations adopted it as their responsibility and do the work. Look at how much political energy was expended around Trump's wall between the US and Mexico to get a sense of how complex and effortful land borders are. I don't see any reason that Internet sovereignty couldn't be equally well-defined and defended... except countries simply aren't doing it. |
|
The inter-net as the name suggests is a network, not a perimeter and runs across boundaries. If you want Trump's border wall on the internet you're talking about handing the government sole access and control to all information going in and out.
That's way beyond cyber defense of private business. And looking at some countries engaging in this right now you better be careful what you ask for.