|
|
|
|
|
by caylus
1557 days ago
|
|
> Lack of price controls did not prevent blackouts to Texans in the US last year. It did cause many folks to be saddled with insane bills. You're conflating two distinct sets of people: - Most consumers pay a fixed price for electricity set by their utility. Many of these people experience blackouts when there was insufficient supply at that price. - Some consumers opted into paying a variable price for electricity. As supply decreased, the price they paid massively increased. But in exchange for the high bills, these customers did not experience blackouts, or at least experienced them later than others. Some in the second group, in retrospect, would have preferred the blackout to the increased price, or perhaps didn't understand the implications of their decision when they originally signed up for a variable and uncapped price. But overall, this situation perfectly illustrates the tradeoffs of controlled vs. uncontrolled prices in the face of supply shortage. |
|
> But in exchange for the high bills, these customers did not experience blackouts, or at least experienced them later than others.
Yeah, so regardless of timing or how much blackout they experienced relative to everyone else, they did experience blackouts. And still paid a lot of money too. Lack of price controls didn't help them in the short term, and in the long term hurt them a lot.